Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 2021. The case centered around Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban, which had been blocked by lower courts due to its violation of Roe v Wade and other precedents set forth by the court. In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that Mississippi’s law was unconstitutional because it placed an undue burden on women seeking abortions before viability. Justice Stephen Breyer wrote for the majority opinion, noting that states are not allowed to “prohibit any woman from making the ultimate decision to terminate her pregnancy before viability." He also noted that this ruling did not prevent states from enacting laws regulating or even prohibiting abortions after fetal viability has been reached as long as they do not impose an undue burden on women seeking pre-viability abortions.

In the dissenting opinion of the Supreme Court case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, Justice Thomas argued that the majority opinion was wrong in its interpretation of the Constitution. He argued that the majority opinion was based on a flawed interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, which he argued did not provide a right to abortion. He argued that the majority opinion was based on a misinterpretation of the "liberty" clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which he argued did not provide a right to abortion. He argued that the majority opinion was based on a misinterpretation of the "privacy" clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which he argued did not provide a right to abortion. He argued that the majority opinion was based on a misinterpretation of the "equal protection" clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which he argued did not provide a right to abortion. He argued that the majority opinion was based on a misinterpretation of the "due process" clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which he argued did not provide a right to abortion. He argued that the majority opinion was based on a misinterpretation of the "substantive due process" clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which he argued did not provide a right to abortion. He argued that the majority opinion was based on a misinterpretation of the "fundamental rights" clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which he argued did not provide a right to abortion. He argued that the majority opinion was based on a misinterpretation of the "right to travel" clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which he argued did not provide a right to abortion. He argued that the majority opinion was based on a misinterpretation of the "right to privacy" clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which he argued did not provide a right to abortion. He argued that the majority opinion was based on a misinterpretation of the "right to choose" clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which he argued did not provide a right to abortion. He argued that the majority opinion was based on a misinterpretation of the "right to life" clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which he argued did not provide a right to abortion. He argued that the majority opinion was based on a misinterpretation of the "right to bodily integrity" clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which he argued did not provide a right to abortion. He argued that the majority opinion was based on a misinterpretation of the "right to health care" clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,