Opinion summary
Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion
The case involved the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and its authority to regulate natural gas prices under the Natural Gas Act. FERC had issued an order that allowed for certain costs incurred by pipelines, specifically those related to purchasing high-cost gas, to be passed on directly to consumers through a purchased gas adjustment clause. Mid-Louisiana Gas Co., along with other parties, challenged this order arguing it was inconsistent with previous regulations and unfairly increased consumer rates without proper oversight or justification. The Supreme Court held in favor of FERC, affirming its broad discretion under the Natural Gas Act to implement such pricing adjustments as long as they are just and reasonable. This decision reinforced FERC's regulatory power over interstate natural gas transactions and upheld its methodology for ensuring fair distribution of costs associated with fluctuating market conditions.
Opinion written by Justice Stevens
Decided 28 Jun 1983 · Official report