Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Gong Lum Et Al. v. Rice Et Al.

• 1927 • 275 U.S. 78 • Taft Court
In the 1927 case of Gong Lum et al. v. Rice et al., a Chinese-American girl named Martha Lum was barred from attending a white public school in Mississippi due to her race, despite being born in the United States and paying taxes that supported these schools. Her father, Gong Lum, sued on her behalf arguing that this violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The U.S Supreme Court upheld Mississippi's decision to segregate its schools by ruling against Martha Lum. The...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taft Court
Term: 1927
Docket: 29
275 U.S. 78
48 S. Ct. 91
72 L. Ed. 172
1927 U.S. LEXIS 256

Gong Lum Et Al. v. Rice Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1927 case of Gong Lum et al. v. Rice et al., a Chinese-American girl named Martha Lum was barred from attending a white public school in Mississippi due to her race, despite being born in the United States and paying taxes that supported these schools. Her father, Gong Lum, sued on her behalf arguing that this violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The U.S Supreme Court upheld Mississippi's decision to segregate its schools by ruling against Martha Lum. The court reasoned that it was within states' rights to regulate their own public education systems and enforce racial segregation policies as long as they provided separate but equal facilities for all races under Plessy v Ferguson precedent (1896). This case highlighted how "separate but equal" doctrine was used not only against African Americans but also other non-white ethnic groups during this era.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the Gong Lum et al. v. Rice et al., 1927 case, there was no recorded dissenting opinion from any of the Supreme Court Justices. The unanimous decision held that a Mississippi school board's decision to bar a Chinese-American girl from attending a white high school did not infringe upon her Fourteenth Amendment rights, as separate schools for different races were considered constitutionally permissible under the "separate but equal" doctrine established by Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). This ruling reinforced racial segregation in education until it was overturned by Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.

Opinion written by Justice WHTaft
Decided: Nov 21, 1927
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms