Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Hanley & Another v. Donoghue

• 1885 • 116 U.S. 1 • Waite Court
Hanley & Another v. Donoghue is a landmark case in the United States Supreme Court that established the modern law of negligence. The case involved a dispute between two parties, Donoghue and the manufacturer of a ginger beer, Hanley & Another. Donoghue had purchased a bottle of ginger beer from a café and drank it, only to find a decomposed snail in the bottle. Donoghue sued Hanley & Another for negligence, claiming that the manufacturer had failed to take reasonable care in the production of...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1885
Docket: 229
116 U.S. 1
6 S. Ct. 242
29 L. Ed. 535
1885 U.S. LEXIS 1882
Argued: Nov 18, 1885

Hanley & Another v. Donoghue

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Hanley & Another v. Donoghue is a landmark case in the United States Supreme Court that established the modern law of negligence. The case involved a dispute between two parties, Donoghue and the manufacturer of a ginger beer, Hanley & Another. Donoghue had purchased a bottle of ginger beer from a café and drank it, only to find a decomposed snail in the bottle. Donoghue sued Hanley & Another for negligence, claiming that the manufacturer had failed to take reasonable care in the production of the ginger beer. The Supreme Court held that the manufacturer had a duty of care to Donoghue, and that the manufacturer had breached that duty by failing to take reasonable care in the production of the ginger beer. The Court also established the concept of proximate cause, which states that a person can be held liable for damages caused by their negligence if the damages were foreseeable. This case established the modern law of negligence and is still cited in courts today.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Hanley & Another v. Donoghue, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a contract between two parties should be enforced even though it had been made without consideration. The majority opinion held that since there was no consideration given for the contract, it could not be enforced and thus must be declared void. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision on the grounds that while consideration is generally required in order for a contract to be enforceable, an exception can exist when one party has already performed their part of an agreement prior to any dispute arising over its validity or lack thereof. In such cases, he argued that equity demands that justice prevail and so contracts should still remain binding despite being made without consideration if one party has already fulfilled their obligations under said agreement.

Opinion written by Justice HGray
Decided: Dec 14, 1885
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms