Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Hodgson, Secretary Of Labor v. Local Union 6799, United Steelworkers Of America, Afl-cio, Et Al.

• 1970 • 403 U.S. 333 • Burger Court
In the 1970 case Hodgson, Secretary of Labor v. Local Union 6799, United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO et al., the US Supreme Court ruled on a dispute involving union elections and federal labor law. The Secretary of Labor had filed suit against a local steelworkers' union after allegations that their election was not conducted in accordance with federal laws outlined in Title IV of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA). The District Court initially dismissed the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1970
Docket: 655
403 U.S. 333
91 S. Ct. 1841
29 L. Ed. 2d 510
1971 U.S. LEXIS 123
Argued: Mar 23, 1971

Hodgson, Secretary Of Labor v. Local Union 6799, United Steelworkers Of America, Afl-cio, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1970 case Hodgson, Secretary of Labor v. Local Union 6799, United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO et al., the US Supreme Court ruled on a dispute involving union elections and federal labor law. The Secretary of Labor had filed suit against a local steelworkers' union after allegations that their election was not conducted in accordance with federal laws outlined in Title IV of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA). The District Court initially dismissed the complaint due to lack of jurisdiction because it believed that internal remedies within the union hadn't been exhausted yet. However, upon reaching Supreme Court level, it was held that exhaustion wasn’t necessary under LMRDA before filing such suits by Department Of Labour(DOL) as DOL's role is to protect public rights rather than settling private disputes among members or between members & unions. Therefore,the decision reversed lower court’s ruling thereby allowing DOL to proceed with its lawsuit without requiring exhaustion.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Hodgson v. Local Union 6799, United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, Justice Hugo Black argued that the Secretary of Labor did not have authority to sue a union on behalf of its members under Title IV of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA). He contended that Congress intended for individual union members to bring such suits themselves. Furthermore, he believed that allowing the Secretary to sue could potentially infrive upon unions' rights to self-governance and autonomy. Justice Black also expressed concern about potential misuse or abuse by government officials who might use this power as leverage over unions in political disputes or labor negotiations. He concluded his dissent by stating that if there were abuses within a union's election process, it should be up to individual members - those directly affected - rather than governmental authorities like the Secretary of Labor - an outsider with no personal stake in these internal affairs –to take legal action.

Opinion written by Justice TMarshall
Decided: Jun 14, 1971
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms