Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Richard R. Keene, Plaintiff In Error Vs. Margaret Meade, Executrix Of Richard W. Meade, Deceased, Defendant In Error

1830 • 28 U.S. 1 • Marshall Court
This case was a dispute between Richard R. Keene and Margaret Meade, executrix of the estate of Richard W. Meade who had passed away. The issue at hand was whether or not Keene should be held liable for an unpaid debt that he had co-signed with his deceased partner, Mr. Meade. In this particular situation, it was determined that since there were no other assets to satisfy the debt from Mr. Meade's estate, then Keene would have to pay back the full amount himself as he had agreed to do when...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Marshall Court
Term: 1830
28 U.S. 1
7 L. Ed. 581
1830 U.S. LEXIS 523
Argued: Jan 14, 1830

Richard R. Keene, Plaintiff In Error Vs. Margaret Meade, Executrix Of Richard W. Meade, Deceased, Defendant In Error

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

This case was a dispute between Richard R. Keene and Margaret Meade, executrix of the estate of Richard W. Meade who had passed away. The issue at hand was whether or not Keene should be held liable for an unpaid debt that he had co-signed with his deceased partner, Mr. Meade. In this particular situation, it was determined that since there were no other assets to satisfy the debt from Mr. Meade's estate, then Keene would have to pay back the full amount himself as he had agreed to do when signing on as a co-signer in the first place; however if there were sufficient funds available within Mr. Meades' estate then those funds could be used instead and thus absolve Keene from having to pay out any money himself towards satisfying this debt obligation.. Ultimately, due to lack of evidence presented by either party during court proceedings regarding what assets may have been present in Mr .Meades'estate ,the Supreme Court ruled against both parties leaving them each responsible for their own legal costs incurred throughout litigation process

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Richard R. Keene vs Margaret Meade, Executrix of Richard W. Meade, the Supreme Court had to decide whether a deed given by an executor was valid or not. The majority opinion held that it was invalid because it did not comply with certain formalities required under state law and thus could not be enforced in court. However, Justice Story dissented from this decision arguing that although there were some technical defects in the deed's formality, they should be overlooked as they did not affect its substance and validity; he argued that if these minor errors were disregarded then justice would prevail for both parties involved in this dispute over land ownership rights. He further stated that since no fraud or mistake had been committed by either party then equity demanded recognition of their respective rights without regard to any technical objections which may have arisen due to non-compliance with legal formalities regarding deeds at the time when this transaction took place

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms