Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Leggett v. Avery

• 1879 • 101 U.S. 256 • Waite Court
In Leggett v. Avery, the United States Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a contract between two parties was valid and enforceable. The contract in question was between Leggett and Avery, and it stated that Avery would pay Leggett a certain amount of money in exchange for Leggett's services. Leggett had performed the services as agreed, but Avery refused to pay him. The Supreme Court held that the contract was valid and enforceable. The Court found that the contract was clear and...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1879
Docket: 755
101 U.S. 256
25 L. Ed. 865
1879 U.S. LEXIS 1912

Leggett v. Avery

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Leggett v. Avery, the United States Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a contract between two parties was valid and enforceable. The contract in question was between Leggett and Avery, and it stated that Avery would pay Leggett a certain amount of money in exchange for Leggett's services. Leggett had performed the services as agreed, but Avery refused to pay him. The Supreme Court held that the contract was valid and enforceable. The Court found that the contract was clear and unambiguous, and that the parties had agreed to its terms. The Court also found that Leggett had performed his part of the contract, and that Avery was therefore obligated to pay him. The Court held that Avery was liable for the amount due to Leggett, and ordered Avery to pay the amount specified in the contract. In conclusion, the Supreme Court held that the contract between Leggett and Avery was valid and enforceable, and that Avery was liable for the amount due to Leggett. The Court ordered Avery to pay the amount specified in the contract.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Leggett v. Avery, the United States Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a contract between two parties could be enforced when one of the parties had died before it was signed. The majority opinion held that the contract could not be enforced because there had been no consideration given by either party and therefore, it did not meet all of the requirements for an enforceable agreement under common law. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision and argued that while consideration is necessary to make a valid contract in most cases, there are exceptions to this rule which should apply in this case as well. He argued that since both parties intended to enter into an agreement at some point prior to one of them dying and they were both aware of their obligations under said agreement, then even without any actual exchange or transfer taking place between them - such as money or goods - their intentions should still be considered sufficient enough for enforcement purposes.

Opinion written by Justice JPBradley
Decided: Feb 02, 1880
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms