Lizzie Beatrice Easterwood v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Opinion summary

Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion

The case involved Lizzie Beatrice Easterwood, who sued CSX Transportation, Inc. after her husband was killed at a railroad crossing when his truck collided with a train operated by CSX. The legal question centered on whether federal law preempted state tort claims regarding the adequacy of warning devices at railway crossings. Specifically, it examined if the Federal Railroad Safety Act (FRSA) and related regulations superseded Georgia's state laws concerning safety measures at rail crossings. The Supreme Court held that federal law did indeed preempt state law in this context because once federal funds are used for grade crossing improvements and certain conditions are met under FRSA regulations, states cannot impose additional requirements or standards beyond those federally mandated.

Opinion written by Justice White

Decided 21 Apr 1993 · Official report

usrep507658.pdfOpen in a new tab