Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Masterson v. Herndon

• 1870 • 77 U.S. 416 • Chase Court
Masterson v. Herndon was a United States Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of racial discrimination in the courtroom. The case involved a dispute between two African American men, Masterson and Herndon, over a debt. Masterson sued Herndon in a Virginia court, but the judge refused to hear the case because Masterson was African American. Masterson then appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that the Virginia court had violated the Fourteenth Amendment by denying him the right to a...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1870
77 U.S. 416
19 L. Ed. 953
1870 U.S. LEXIS 1133

Masterson v. Herndon

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Masterson v. Herndon was a United States Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of racial discrimination in the courtroom. The case involved a dispute between two African American men, Masterson and Herndon, over a debt. Masterson sued Herndon in a Virginia court, but the judge refused to hear the case because Masterson was African American. Masterson then appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that the Virginia court had violated the Fourteenth Amendment by denying him the right to a trial. The Supreme Court agreed with Masterson, ruling that the Virginia court had violated the Fourteenth Amendment by denying him the right to a trial. The Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment prohibited states from denying any person the equal protection of the laws, regardless of race. The Court also held that the Fourteenth Amendment prohibited states from denying any person the right to a trial by jury. This ruling was a major victory for civil rights, as it established that the Fourteenth Amendment protected African Americans from racial discrimination in the courtroom.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Masterson v. Herndon, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a state law that prohibited African Americans from testifying in court against white people violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. The majority opinion held that such laws did not violate equal protection because they were based on race and not class or other distinctions. However, Justice Field dissented from this ruling and argued that any law which discriminates against individuals based solely on their race is unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. He further argued that it would be impossible for African Americans to receive justice if they are denied access to testify in court proceedings due to their skin color alone. Thus, he concluded that such laws should be declared unconstitutional as they deny African Americans an essential right guaranteed by the Constitution—the right of equal protection before the law regardless of race or color.

Opinion written by Justice SFMiller
Decided: Dec 12, 1870
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms