Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Miles v. United States

• 1880 • 103 U.S. 304 • Waite Court
Miles v. United States was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1881. The case involved a dispute between the United States and Miles, a former Confederate soldier, over the ownership of a piece of land in Mississippi. Miles had purchased the land from the United States in 1867, but the United States later claimed that the land had been illegally sold and sought to reclaim it. The Supreme Court held that the United States had no right to reclaim the land from Miles. The Court...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1880
103 U.S. 304
26 L. Ed. 481
1880 U.S. LEXIS 2120
Argued: Jan 25, 1881

Miles v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Miles v. United States was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1881. The case involved a dispute between the United States and Miles, a former Confederate soldier, over the ownership of a piece of land in Mississippi. Miles had purchased the land from the United States in 1867, but the United States later claimed that the land had been illegally sold and sought to reclaim it. The Supreme Court held that the United States had no right to reclaim the land from Miles. The Court reasoned that the United States had not taken any action to reclaim the land until after Miles had purchased it, and that the United States had not provided any evidence that the sale was illegal. The Court also noted that the United States had not taken any steps to protect its interests in the land prior to Miles' purchase. The Court concluded that the United States had no right to reclaim the land from Miles, and that Miles was the rightful owner of the land. The Court's decision established that the United States could not reclaim land from a purchaser if it had not taken any steps to protect its interests prior to the sale.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

Justice Field delivered the dissenting opinion in Miles v. United States, arguing that the majority's decision was contrary to both precedent and common sense. He argued that Congress had no authority to pass a law which would allow for an individual's property to be taken without due process of law or just compensation, as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. Furthermore, he noted that even if such a power existed within Congress' purview, it could not be applied retroactively so as to affect rights already vested under prior laws. Justice Field concluded his dissent by noting that while he did not doubt Congress' right and duty to protect public lands from encroachment or destruction, this should never come at the expense of individuals’ constitutional rights.

Opinion written by Justice WBWoods
Decided: Apr 04, 1881
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms