Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Passenger Cases: George Smith, Plaintiff In Error. v. William Turner, Health-commissioner Of The Port Of New York

1849 • 48 U.S. 283 • Taney Court
The Passenger Cases, George Smith v. William Turner, was a Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of immigration and whether or not states had the power to regulate it. The plaintiff argued that Congress alone had authority over immigration under Article I of the Constitution and any state regulation would be unconstitutional. The defendant countered by arguing that states could impose regulations on immigrants in order to protect public health and safety within their borders. Ultimately,...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taney Court
Term: 1849
48 U.S. 283
12 L. Ed. 702
1849 U.S. LEXIS 351
Argued: Dec 09, 1845

Passenger Cases: George Smith, Plaintiff In Error. v. William Turner, Health-commissioner Of The Port Of New York

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Passenger Cases, George Smith v. William Turner, was a Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of immigration and whether or not states had the power to regulate it. The plaintiff argued that Congress alone had authority over immigration under Article I of the Constitution and any state regulation would be unconstitutional. The defendant countered by arguing that states could impose regulations on immigrants in order to protect public health and safety within their borders. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of Turner with a 5-4 decision which held that while Congress did have exclusive control over naturalization (the process through which an immigrant becomes a citizen), they did not have exclusive control over regulating immigration itself; instead this power fell to both federal and state governments depending on what type of regulation was being imposed. This ruling set precedent for future cases involving similar issues regarding immigration law as well as other areas where federalism is at play between different levels of government.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the Passenger Cases, George Smith argued that a law passed by Congress in 1819 which allowed for the collection of fees from passengers arriving to ports in the United States was unconstitutional. The majority opinion held that this law did not violate any constitutional provisions and could be enforced. However, Justice Daniel dissented from this decision and argued that it violated both Article I Section 9 of the Constitution as well as state sovereignty rights granted under Amendment X. He reasoned that since immigration is an issue traditionally left up to states rather than federal government control, allowing Congress to pass such laws would give them too much power over something they had no authority over. Furthermore, he noted how these fees were being used for purposes other than what they were intended for (i.e., health inspections) and thus constituted taxation without representation or due process of law - another violation of Constitutional protections afforded citizens at all levels of government

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms