Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

School Board Of City Of Richmond, Virginia, Et Al. v. State Board Of Education Of Virginia Et Al.

• 1972 • 412 U.S. 92 • Burger Court
The case of the School Board of City of Richmond, Virginia v. State Board of Education of Virginia in 1972 revolved around a dispute over school desegregation plans. The Supreme Court ruled that federal courts have the authority to order busing as a means to achieve racial integration in public schools. This decision was based on previous rulings which held that segregation is unconstitutional and all deliberate speed should be used to eliminate it. In this particular case, the court found that...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1972
Docket: 72-549
412 U.S. 92
93 S. Ct. 1952
36 L. Ed. 2d 771
1973 U.S. LEXIS 68
Argued: Apr 23, 1973

School Board Of City Of Richmond, Virginia, Et Al. v. State Board Of Education Of Virginia Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The case of the School Board of City of Richmond, Virginia v. State Board of Education of Virginia in 1972 revolved around a dispute over school desegregation plans. The Supreme Court ruled that federal courts have the authority to order busing as a means to achieve racial integration in public schools. This decision was based on previous rulings which held that segregation is unconstitutional and all deliberate speed should be used to eliminate it. In this particular case, the court found that local authorities had not acted with sufficient urgency or effectiveness in eliminating segregation from their schools and thus intervention by federal courts was necessary and appropriate.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for the School Board of City of Richmond, Virginia v. State Board of Education case in 1972, Justice William O. Douglas argued that the majority's decision was a step backward in achieving racial equality and integration within schools. He contended that by allowing state authorities to maintain racially segregated school districts under their "freedom-of-choice" plans, they were effectively perpetuating systemic racism and inequality within education systems. Furthermore, he criticized this approach as it placed an unfair burden on black students who had to actively choose integrated schooling rather than having it be a given right. In his view, true desegregation would only occur when states took proactive measures towards integrating schools rather than leaving it up to individual choice which could easily be influenced by societal pressures or biases.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: May 21, 1973
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms