Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Smith v. Interstate Commerce Commission

• 1917 • 245 U.S. 33 • White Court
In the case of Smith v. Interstate Commerce Commission (1917), the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether or not the Interstate Commerce Commission had overstepped its authority by ordering a railroad company to cease discriminatory practices against black passengers. The plaintiff, Mr. Smith, argued that he and other African American passengers were being unfairly treated by Southern Railway Company despite paying equal fare as white passengers for first-class tickets. He...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1917
Docket: 337
245 U.S. 33
38 S. Ct. 30
62 L. Ed. 135
1917 U.S. LEXIS 1783
Argued: Oct 02, 1917

Smith v. Interstate Commerce Commission

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Smith v. Interstate Commerce Commission (1917), the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether or not the Interstate Commerce Commission had overstepped its authority by ordering a railroad company to cease discriminatory practices against black passengers. The plaintiff, Mr. Smith, argued that he and other African American passengers were being unfairly treated by Southern Railway Company despite paying equal fare as white passengers for first-class tickets. He claimed they were provided inferior accommodation and services compared to their white counterparts which violated his rights under the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887. The court ruled in favor of Mr. Smith stating that such racial discrimination indeed constituted an unjust practice under said act, thereby affirming ICC's order for cessation of these discriminatory practices by Southern Railway Company. This landmark decision underscored federal government’s commitment towards ensuring equality in public accommodations irrespective of race during a time when segregation was prevalent across several states in America.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Smith v. Interstate Commerce Commission, it was argued that the Supreme Court should not have jurisdiction over this case as it pertains to a matter of administrative law and regulatory oversight, which is within the purview of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). The ICC's decision to allow certain railroad companies to increase their freight rates was based on its expert understanding and interpretation of complex economic conditions affecting these businesses. It was contended that such decisions are best left with specialized agencies like ICC rather than courts. Furthermore, there were concerns about judicial overreach and undermining regulatory authorities' autonomy in making informed decisions within their areas of expertise. This could set a dangerous precedent where courts might feel emboldened to interfere in matters they may lack comprehensive knowledge or understanding about.

Opinion written by Justice JMcKenna
Decided: Nov 05, 1917
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms