Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Of America, v. Lucas Flour Co.

• 1961 • 369 U.S. 95 • Warren Court
In the case of Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. Lucas Flour Co., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a labor dispute involving breach of contract and strike activity. The union had gone on strike despite a no-strike clause in their collective bargaining agreement with Lucas Flour Company. When sued for damages by the company due to losses incurred during the strike, they argued that federal law pre-empted state law regarding breaches of labor contracts and thus...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1961
Docket: 50
369 U.S. 95
82 S. Ct. 571
7 L. Ed. 2d 593
1962 U.S. LEXIS 2226
Argued: Nov 07, 1961

Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Of America, v. Lucas Flour Co.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. Lucas Flour Co., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a labor dispute involving breach of contract and strike activity. The union had gone on strike despite a no-strike clause in their collective bargaining agreement with Lucas Flour Company. When sued for damages by the company due to losses incurred during the strike, they argued that federal law pre-empted state law regarding breaches of labor contracts and thus should be handled through National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) procedures rather than civil court proceedings under state law. The Supreme Court disagreed with this argument and held that while federal labor laws did indeed govern conduct like strikes or lockouts, it didn't prevent states from enforcing contractual obligations between unions and employers as long as those enforcement actions did not conflict with federal policy or interfere with NLRB jurisdiction over unfair labor practices. This decision clarified that although national legislation regulates many aspects of industrial relations in order to promote stability within industries across states; individual agreements made at local level can still have legal force if they do not contradict these broader policies.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. Lucas Flour Co., Justice Whittaker argued that the majority's decision to allow state courts to interpret collective bargaining agreements under state law was a mistake. He believed this would lead to inconsistent interpretations and undermine national labor policy. Instead, he suggested that federal common law should be used in these cases as it would provide uniformity across states and better align with national labor objectives. Furthermore, he disagreed with the majority’s view that allowing state court jurisdiction did not interfere with National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) authority; rather he contended it could potentially conflict or overlap causing confusion and inefficiency within the system.

Opinion written by Justice PStewart
Decided: Mar 05, 1962
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms