Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The Anna Maria

1817 • 15 U.S. 327 • Marshall Court
The Anna Maria was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1817. The case involved a dispute between two parties over ownership of a ship, with one party claiming that they had purchased the vessel from its original owner and the other party claiming that they were still legally entitled to it. The court ultimately ruled in favor of the first party, finding that their purchase was valid and binding under maritime law. In doing so, it established an important precedent for how...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Marshall Court
Term: 1817
15 U.S. 327
4 L. Ed. 252
1817 U.S. LEXIS 408
Argued: Mar 11, 1817

The Anna Maria

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Anna Maria was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1817. The case involved a dispute between two parties over ownership of a ship, with one party claiming that they had purchased the vessel from its original owner and the other party claiming that they were still legally entitled to it. The court ultimately ruled in favor of the first party, finding that their purchase was valid and binding under maritime law. In doing so, it established an important precedent for how disputes involving vessels should be handled going forward. This decision also provided clarity on issues such as when title passes upon sale or transfer of ships and what constitutes sufficient proof of ownership rights at sea.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In The Anna Maria, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a foreign vessel that had been captured by an American privateer during wartime could be lawfully condemned as a prize of war. Justice Story delivered the dissenting opinion, arguing that it would be unjust for such vessels to be subject to condemnation because they were not actually engaged in hostilities against America and thus did not fall within the scope of lawful captures under international law. He further argued that even if these vessels were considered enemy property, their owners should still have some recourse since they had done nothing wrong and there was no evidence suggesting any hostile intent on their part. Finally, he noted that allowing such condemnations would set a dangerous precedent whereby neutral nations could become targets of warfare without just cause or provocation.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms