Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The Brig Ann, M'clain, Master

1815 • 13 U.S. 289 • Marshall Court
The Brig Ann, M'Clain, Master was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1815. The case involved a dispute between two parties over ownership of goods that were shipped on board the Brig Ann. The plaintiff argued that they had purchased certain goods from the defendant and paid for them with money and notes prior to their shipment on board the vessel. However, when it came time to collect payment for those goods upon arrival at port, they found out that another party had already...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Marshall Court
Term: 1815
13 U.S. 289
3 L. Ed. 734
1815 U.S. LEXIS 391

The Brig Ann, M'clain, Master

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Brig Ann, M'Clain, Master was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1815. The case involved a dispute between two parties over ownership of goods that were shipped on board the Brig Ann. The plaintiff argued that they had purchased certain goods from the defendant and paid for them with money and notes prior to their shipment on board the vessel. However, when it came time to collect payment for those goods upon arrival at port, they found out that another party had already taken possession of them claiming title as an agent of the defendant. The court ultimately held in favor of the plaintiff finding that since they had already paid for those goods before shipping them aboard ship, any subsequent claim made by another party did not supersede their own right to receive payment upon delivery at port.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In The Brig Ann, M'Clain, Master (1815), the Supreme Court held that a master of a vessel was not liable for damages caused by his crew's negligence. In dissent, Justice Story argued that the master should be held responsible because he had control over and responsibility for the actions of his crew. He noted that it would be unjust to allow masters to escape liability when their crews acted negligently or unlawfully while on board their vessels. Furthermore, he argued that if masters were allowed to avoid such liability then they would have no incentive to ensure proper discipline among their crews and prevent them from engaging in negligent behavior. Therefore, Justice Story concluded that holding masters accountable for any damage caused by their crew's negligence was necessary in order to promote safety at sea and protect those who may suffer losses due to such negligence.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms