Opinion summary
Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion
The case involved the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and its rulemaking procedures under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) challenged a regulation by the NRC that allowed nuclear power plants to store spent fuel on-site without individual environmental impact statements. The Supreme Court held in favor of the NRC, ruling that their decision was entitled to deference as it was not arbitrary or capricious. This decision reinforced agencies' discretion in interpreting statutes they administer, provided their interpretations are reasonable. It emphasized judicial restraint when reviewing agency decisions unless there is clear evidence of irrationality or procedural inadequacy.
Opinion written by Justice O'Connor
Decided 6 Jun 1983 · Official report