Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Commodore Park, Inc.

• 1944 • 324 U.S. 386 • Stone Court
In the case of United States v. Commodore Park, Inc., 1944, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the government's right to condemn private property for public use under its power of eminent domain. The dispute arose when Commodore Park, a housing corporation in Norfolk, Virginia refused to sell their properties to the federal government who intended to use them for military housing during World War II. The company argued that this was not a valid public use as it would only serve military...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Stone Court
Term: 1944
Docket: 495
324 U.S. 386
65 S. Ct. 803
89 L. Ed. 1017
1945 U.S. LEXIS 2616
Argued: Feb 09, 1945

United States v. Commodore Park, Inc.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of United States v. Commodore Park, Inc., 1944, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the government's right to condemn private property for public use under its power of eminent domain. The dispute arose when Commodore Park, a housing corporation in Norfolk, Virginia refused to sell their properties to the federal government who intended to use them for military housing during World War II. The company argued that this was not a valid public use as it would only serve military personnel and not civilians at large. However, considering wartime exigencies and national security interests, the court held that providing homes for naval personnel constituted a legitimate public purpose given their crucial role in defending American shores from enemy attack.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of United States v. Commodore Park, Inc., argued that the majority's decision to allow for a condemnation proceeding against a private corporation was an overreach of government power and violated principles of due process. The dissenters contended that there was no clear public necessity or benefit demonstrated by the government to justify such action, which they believed should be reserved only for extraordinary circumstances. They also expressed concern about potential abuse of this power and its impact on property rights if left unchecked. Furthermore, they disagreed with the majority's interpretation of "just compensation," arguing it did not adequately consider all relevant factors affecting value and thus failed to ensure fairness towards the property owner.

Opinion written by Justice HLBlack
Decided: Mar 26, 1945
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms