Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

The United States, Plaintiff In Error, Vs. John P. Gratiot, Robert Burton, Charles S. Hempstead, And Dickerson B. Moorehouse, Defendants In Error

1840 • 39 U.S. 526 • Taney Court
The United States brought a case against John P. Gratiot, Robert Burton, Charles S. Hempstead and Dickerson B. Moorehouse for the alleged violation of an act of Congress that prohibited any person from engaging in trade with foreign nations without first obtaining a license from the President or Secretary of State. The defendants argued that they were exempt from this requirement as citizens of Missouri who had been trading with Spanish-held territories before it became part of the United...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taney Court
Term: 1840
39 U.S. 526
10 L. Ed. 573
1840 U.S. LEXIS 386
Argued: Feb 28, 1840

The United States, Plaintiff In Error, Vs. John P. Gratiot, Robert Burton, Charles S. Hempstead, And Dickerson B. Moorehouse, Defendants In Error

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The United States brought a case against John P. Gratiot, Robert Burton, Charles S. Hempstead and Dickerson B. Moorehouse for the alleged violation of an act of Congress that prohibited any person from engaging in trade with foreign nations without first obtaining a license from the President or Secretary of State. The defendants argued that they were exempt from this requirement as citizens of Missouri who had been trading with Spanish-held territories before it became part of the United States under the Louisiana Purchase Treaty in 1803 and therefore did not need to obtain such a license. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of the defendants, finding that their actions were protected by treaty rights granted to them prior to becoming U.S citizens and thus they did not need to obtain licenses for their activities as required by law at that time.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the United States Supreme Court case of The United States, Plaintiff in Error vs. John P. Gratiot, Robert Burton, Charles S. Hempstead and Dickerson B. Moorehouse, Defendants in Error (1840), the dissenting opinion argued that Congress had no authority to pass a law which would grant exclusive rights to individuals for public works such as canals or roads on navigable waters within a state's boundaries without its consent first being obtained from the state itself. This was because it violated Article I Section 10 Clause 3 of the Constitution which states that “No State shall…without its Consent…grant any Title of Nobility” and this included granting exclusive privileges over public works within their borders without their permission first being granted by them. Furthermore, they argued that even if Congress did have such power then it could not be used retroactively since there were already existing contracts between private parties prior to when this law was passed which should still be honored according to established legal principles at the time; thus making this new law invalid due to lack of Congressional authority or unconstitutionality depending on how one viewed it either way rendering it void ab initio (from inception).

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms