Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Parker

• 1886 • 120 U.S. 89 • Waite Court
United States v. Parker is a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of whether the federal government had the authority to regulate the sale of alcohol in Indian country. The case was brought by the United States against William Parker, a member of the Choctaw Nation, who was accused of selling alcohol to members of the Choctaw Nation in Indian country without a license. The Supreme Court held that the federal government had the authority to regulate the sale of alcohol in...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1886
Docket: 945
120 U.S. 89
7 S. Ct. 454
30 L. Ed. 601
1887 U.S. LEXIS 1946
Argued: Jan 03, 1887

United States v. Parker

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

United States v. Parker is a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of whether the federal government had the authority to regulate the sale of alcohol in Indian country. The case was brought by the United States against William Parker, a member of the Choctaw Nation, who was accused of selling alcohol to members of the Choctaw Nation in Indian country without a license. The Supreme Court held that the federal government had the authority to regulate the sale of alcohol in Indian country. The Court reasoned that the federal government had the power to regulate the sale of alcohol in Indian country because it had the power to regulate commerce with Indian tribes. The Court also held that the federal government had the power to regulate the sale of alcohol in Indian country because it had the power to protect the health and welfare of the Indians. The Court's decision in United States v. Parker established that the federal government had the authority to regulate the sale of alcohol in Indian country. This decision has been cited in numerous cases since then, and it has been used to support the federal government's authority to regulate the sale of alcohol in Indian country.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

Justice Field wrote the dissenting opinion in United States v. Parker, arguing that Congress did not have the authority to pass a law prohibiting citizens from selling liquor on Indian reservations. He argued that while Congress had the power to regulate commerce with Native American tribes, it could not prohibit such activities altogether without infringing upon their sovereignty and rights as independent nations. Furthermore, he noted that this was an issue of state rather than federal jurisdiction since states were responsible for regulating alcohol sales within their borders. He concluded by stating that if Congress wanted to prevent Indians from engaging in certain activities related to alcohol sales then they should do so through treaties or other agreements between them and individual tribes instead of passing laws which applied across all tribal lands indiscriminately.

Opinion written by Justice SMatthews
Decided: Jan 24, 1887
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms