Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Ryder & Another

• 1883 • 110 U.S. 729 • Waite Court
In United States v. Ryder & Another, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether the United States had the right to bring a criminal prosecution against two individuals for the alleged violation of a federal statute. The two individuals, Ryder and another, had been charged with violating a federal statute that prohibited the sale of liquor in Indian country. The Supreme Court held that the United States had the right to bring a criminal prosecution against the two...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1883
Docket: 156
110 U.S. 729
4 S. Ct. 196
28 L. Ed. 308
1884 U.S. LEXIS 1734
Argued: Dec 12, 1883

United States v. Ryder & Another

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In United States v. Ryder & Another, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether the United States had the right to bring a criminal prosecution against two individuals for the alleged violation of a federal statute. The two individuals, Ryder and another, had been charged with violating a federal statute that prohibited the sale of liquor in Indian country. The Supreme Court held that the United States had the right to bring a criminal prosecution against the two individuals. The Court reasoned that the federal statute in question was a valid exercise of Congress’s power to regulate commerce with Indian tribes, and that the United States had the right to enforce the statute. The Court also held that the United States had the right to bring a criminal prosecution against the two individuals, even though they were not members of an Indian tribe. In conclusion, the Supreme Court held that the United States had the right to bring a criminal prosecution against Ryder and another for the alleged violation of a federal statute. The Court reasoned that the federal statute in question was a valid exercise of Congress’s power to regulate commerce with Indian tribes, and that the United States had the right to enforce the statute.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In United States v. Ryder & Another, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a federal court had jurisdiction over an action brought by the United States against two individuals for failing to pay duties on imported goods. The majority opinion held that it did not have such jurisdiction because there was no allegation of fraud or any other special circumstances in this case. Justice Field dissented from this decision and argued that Congress has given federal courts broad authority to hear cases involving customs duties, regardless of whether fraud is alleged or not. He further noted that if the government's claim were allowed to be heard in state court instead, then it would be deprived of its right under Article III of the Constitution to bring suit in a federal forum when seeking relief related to matters arising out of foreign commerce and navigation laws.

Opinion written by Justice JPBradley
Decided: Mar 10, 1884
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms