Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Stowell

• 1889 • 133 U.S. 1 • Fuller Court
United States v. Stowell was a Supreme Court case decided in 1879. The case involved a dispute between the United States and Stowell, a fisherman, over the ownership of a whale carcass that had been found in the waters off the coast of Massachusetts. The United States argued that the whale was a public resource and thus belonged to the government, while Stowell argued that he had a right to the whale as he had found it first. The Supreme Court ultimately sided with the United States, ruling...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1889
Docket: 167
133 U.S. 1
10 S. Ct. 244
33 L. Ed. 555
1890 U.S. LEXIS 1886

United States v. Stowell

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

United States v. Stowell was a Supreme Court case decided in 1879. The case involved a dispute between the United States and Stowell, a fisherman, over the ownership of a whale carcass that had been found in the waters off the coast of Massachusetts. The United States argued that the whale was a public resource and thus belonged to the government, while Stowell argued that he had a right to the whale as he had found it first. The Supreme Court ultimately sided with the United States, ruling that the whale was a public resource and thus belonged to the government. The Court reasoned that the whale was a part of the public domain and thus could not be owned by any individual. The decision established the precedent that the public has a right to the resources of the sea, and that individuals cannot claim ownership of them.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion of United States v. Stowell, Justice Harlan argued that Congress had no authority to enact a law criminalizing the possession and sale of liquor without a license. He stated that such an act was beyond Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause because it did not involve any interstate commerce or foreign trade. Furthermore, he argued that even if there were some connection between this activity and interstate commerce, it would still be unconstitutional as an infringement on state police powers since regulating alcohol is traditionally within the purview of states rather than federal government. Finally, he noted that while Congress may have had good intentions in passing this law – namely curbing drunkenness – its means for doing so were constitutionally questionable at best and should not be allowed to stand.

Opinion written by Justice HGray
Decided: Jan 20, 1890
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms