Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Walden v. Skinner

• 1879 • 101 U.S. 577 • Waite Court
Walden v. Skinner was a United States Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of whether a state could impose a tax on a federal employee's salary. The plaintiff, Walden, was a federal employee who had been assessed a state tax on his salary. He argued that the tax was unconstitutional because it interfered with the federal government's power to regulate its own employees. The Supreme Court agreed with Walden, ruling that the state tax was unconstitutional because it interfered with the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1879
Docket: 176
101 U.S. 577
25 L. Ed. 963
1879 U.S. LEXIS 1959
Argued: Mar 15, 1880

Walden v. Skinner

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Walden v. Skinner was a United States Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of whether a state could impose a tax on a federal employee's salary. The plaintiff, Walden, was a federal employee who had been assessed a state tax on his salary. He argued that the tax was unconstitutional because it interfered with the federal government's power to regulate its own employees. The Supreme Court agreed with Walden, ruling that the state tax was unconstitutional because it interfered with the federal government's power to regulate its own employees. The Court held that the state tax was an unconstitutional burden on the federal government's power to regulate its own employees. The Court also held that the state tax was an unconstitutional interference with the federal government's power to regulate its own employees. The Court's decision established the principle that states cannot impose taxes on federal employees' salaries. This decision has been cited in numerous cases since then, and it remains an important precedent in the area of federalism.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

Justice Field delivered the dissenting opinion in Walden v. Skinner, arguing that the court should have dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction. He argued that a federal district court had no authority to issue an injunction against state officers acting under their official capacity and within their respective states. Furthermore, he noted that Congress had not given any power to such courts to do so and thus it was beyond its scope of authority. Additionally, Justice Field argued that if this type of action were allowed then it would be tantamount to allowing one state's laws or regulations supersede those of another state which is contrary to our Constitution's guarantee of equal protection among all states. Ultimately, Justice Field concluded by stating his belief that allowing federal courts this kind of power over individual states would lead down a dangerous path towards centralizing too much control in Washington D.C., something which could potentially threaten our nation’s system as we know it today

Opinion written by Justice NClifford
Decided: Mar 29, 1880
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms