Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Walker v. The State Harbor Commissioners

• 1873 • 84 U.S. 648 • Chase Court
Walker v. The State Harbor Commissioners is a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1873. The case involved a dispute between the plaintiff, Walker, and the defendant, the State Harbor Commissioners, over the ownership of a pier in the harbor of San Francisco. Walker had built the pier in 1867 and had been using it for his business since then. The State Harbor Commissioners had attempted to take possession of the pier in 1871, claiming that it was part of the public harbor and...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1873
84 U.S. 648
21 L. Ed. 744
1873 U.S. LEXIS 1410
Argued: Jan 20, 1874

Walker v. The State Harbor Commissioners

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Walker v. The State Harbor Commissioners is a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1873. The case involved a dispute between the plaintiff, Walker, and the defendant, the State Harbor Commissioners, over the ownership of a pier in the harbor of San Francisco. Walker had built the pier in 1867 and had been using it for his business since then. The State Harbor Commissioners had attempted to take possession of the pier in 1871, claiming that it was part of the public harbor and thus belonged to the state. Walker argued that he had a valid claim to the pier, as he had built it and had been using it for his business for four years. The Supreme Court ultimately sided with Walker, ruling that the State Harbor Commissioners had no right to take possession of the pier. The Court held that the pier was not part of the public harbor, and thus the state had no right to take possession of it. The Court also held that Walker had a valid claim to the pier, as he had built it and had been using it for his business for four years. The Court thus ruled in favor of Walker, and the State Harbor Commissioners were not allowed to take possession of the pier.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Walker v. The State Harbor Commissioners, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a state law that allowed for the condemnation of private property in order to build a public harbor was constitutional. Justice Field dissented from the majority opinion and argued that while it is true that states have broad powers to regulate their own internal affairs, this power does not extend so far as to allow them to take away an individual's right to their property without just compensation. He further argued that if such laws were upheld then individuals would be deprived of one of their most fundamental rights - namely, the right to possess and enjoy what they lawfully acquire - which he believed violated both natural justice and due process under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Opinion written by Justice SJField
Decided: Jan 26, 1874
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms