Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

White's Bank v. Smith

• 1868 • 74 U.S. 646 • Chase Court
White's Bank v. Smith was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1868. The case involved a dispute between White's Bank and Smith, a customer of the bank. Smith had deposited a large sum of money with the bank, and the bank had issued him a certificate of deposit. Smith then attempted to withdraw the money from the bank, but the bank refused to honor the certificate of deposit. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Smith, finding that the bank had a duty to honor the certificate of...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1868
74 U.S. 646
19 L. Ed. 211
1868 U.S. LEXIS 1047
Argued: Feb 17, 1869

White's Bank v. Smith

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

White's Bank v. Smith was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1868. The case involved a dispute between White's Bank and Smith, a customer of the bank. Smith had deposited a large sum of money with the bank, and the bank had issued him a certificate of deposit. Smith then attempted to withdraw the money from the bank, but the bank refused to honor the certificate of deposit. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Smith, finding that the bank had a duty to honor the certificate of deposit. The Court held that the bank had a duty to honor the certificate of deposit, and that Smith was entitled to the money he had deposited. The Court also held that the bank was liable for any damages caused by its failure to honor the certificate of deposit. This case established the principle that banks have a duty to honor certificates of deposit, and that customers are entitled to the money they have deposited. This case also established the principle that banks are liable for any damages caused by their failure to honor certificates of deposit.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In White's Bank v. Smith, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a bank could recover an amount of money that had been paid out to a third party in accordance with instructions from one of its depositors who had since died. The majority opinion held that the bank did not have any right to reclaim this payment as it was made in good faith and without knowledge of any defect or irregularity in the transaction. However, Justice Field dissented from this ruling on the grounds that banks should be able to protect themselves against such losses by requiring proof of death before honoring requests for withdrawals from deceased customers' accounts. He argued that allowing banks to do so would provide them with greater security and stability while also protecting their customers' interests by ensuring funds are only released when appropriate authorization is provided.

Opinion written by Justice SNelson
Decided: Mar 29, 1869
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms