Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Donnelly

• 1989 • 494 U.S. 820 • Rehnquist Court
In the case of Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Donnelly in 1989, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that plaintiffs could bring Title VII employment discrimination lawsuits in any federal court where their employer does business, not just where they work or applied for work. The plaintiff, James P. Donnelly had filed a lawsuit against his former employer Yellow Freight Systems under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act alleging racial discrimination and retaliation at its Chicago Ridge facility in...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1989
Docket: 89-431
494 U.S. 820
110 S. Ct. 1566
108 L. Ed. 2d 834
1990 U.S. LEXIS 2023
Argued: Feb 28, 1990

Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Donnelly

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Donnelly in 1989, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that plaintiffs could bring Title VII employment discrimination lawsuits in any federal court where their employer does business, not just where they work or applied for work. The plaintiff, James P. Donnelly had filed a lawsuit against his former employer Yellow Freight Systems under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act alleging racial discrimination and retaliation at its Chicago Ridge facility in Illinois but brought suit in Kansas City district court because it was more convenient for him to litigate there as he lived nearby. However, Yellow Freight argued that venue was improper since none of the alleged discriminatory acts occurred within that jurisdiction. The District Court dismissed his complaint on grounds of improper venue and this decision was upheld by Tenth Circuit Appeals Court which held that a proper venue is only where an unlawful employment practice is alleged to have been committed. However, upon reaching Supreme Court level review; Justice Thurgood Marshall writing for unanimous bench reversed lower courts' decisions stating "the language and design" of Title VII's provision allows suits wherever respondent has substantial business presence regardless if no significant act related to claim happened there.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Donnelly, Justice Thurgood Marshall argued that the majority's decision to allow plaintiffs in Title VII cases to seek jury trials and compensatory damages would significantly alter Congress' carefully crafted enforcement scheme under this law. He contended that such a change should be made by Congress itself rather than through judicial interpretation of existing legislation. Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential negative consequences of allowing jury trials in these cases, including an increased burden on federal courts and possible delays or denials of justice for victims of discrimination due to longer trial times and higher litigation costs.

Opinion written by Justice JPStevens
Decided: Apr 17, 1990
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms