Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Lawrence v. Morgan's Railroad And Steamship Company

• 1886 • 121 U.S. 634 • Waite Court
In Lawrence v. Morgan's Railroad and Steamship Company, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether a contract between two parties was valid. The plaintiff, Lawrence, had entered into a contract with the defendant, Morgan's Railroad and Steamship Company, to transport goods from New York to San Francisco. The contract provided that Lawrence would pay the company a certain amount of money for the transportation of the goods. However, Lawrence failed to pay the full amount...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1886
Docket: 251
121 U.S. 634
7 S. Ct. 1013
30 L. Ed. 1018
1887 U.S. LEXIS 2081

Lawrence v. Morgan's Railroad And Steamship Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Lawrence v. Morgan's Railroad and Steamship Company, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether a contract between two parties was valid. The plaintiff, Lawrence, had entered into a contract with the defendant, Morgan's Railroad and Steamship Company, to transport goods from New York to San Francisco. The contract provided that Lawrence would pay the company a certain amount of money for the transportation of the goods. However, Lawrence failed to pay the full amount due under the contract. Morgan's Railroad and Steamship Company then sued Lawrence for the unpaid balance. The Supreme Court held that the contract between the parties was valid and enforceable. The Court noted that the contract was clear and unambiguous, and that Lawrence had agreed to pay the full amount due under the contract. The Court also noted that Lawrence had failed to pay the full amount due, and that Morgan's Railroad and Steamship Company was entitled to recover the unpaid balance. The Court therefore held that the contract was valid and enforceable, and that Morgan's Railroad and Steamship Company was entitled to recover the unpaid balance from Lawrence.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Lawrence v. Morgan's Railroad and Steamship Company, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a railroad company could be held liable for injuries sustained by an employee while on duty. The majority opinion found that the company could not be held liable because it had taken reasonable steps to protect its employees from injury. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision, arguing that employers should bear some responsibility for their employees' safety in certain circumstances. He argued that if an employer fails to provide a safe working environment or adequate safeguards against potential harm then they should be held accountable when something goes wrong and someone is injured as a result of their negligence. Furthermore, he argued that even if all precautions were taken there may still exist situations where liability can attach due to unforeseen risks associated with particular jobs or tasks which are beyond the control of either party involved in such cases.

Opinion written by Justice MRWaite
Decided: May 02, 1887
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms