Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

United States v. Corliss Steam-engine Company

• 1875 • 91 U.S. 321 • Waite Court
United States v. Corliss Steam-Engine Company was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of patent infringement. The case involved the Corliss Steam-Engine Company, which had been accused of infringing on the patent of another company, the American Steam-Engine Company. The Corliss Steam-Engine Company argued that the patent was invalid because it was not novel and that the patent was not infringed upon. The Supreme Court held that the patent was valid and that the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1875
Docket: 704
91 U.S. 321
23 L. Ed. 397
1875 U.S. LEXIS 1368

United States v. Corliss Steam-engine Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

United States v. Corliss Steam-Engine Company was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of patent infringement. The case involved the Corliss Steam-Engine Company, which had been accused of infringing on the patent of another company, the American Steam-Engine Company. The Corliss Steam-Engine Company argued that the patent was invalid because it was not novel and that the patent was not infringed upon. The Supreme Court held that the patent was valid and that the Corliss Steam-Engine Company had infringed upon it. The Court found that the patent was novel and that the Corliss Steam-Engine Company had copied the design of the American Steam-Engine Company's patent. The Court also held that the Corliss Steam-Engine Company had not taken reasonable steps to avoid infringing on the patent. The Court's decision established that patent infringement is a serious offense and that companies must take reasonable steps to avoid infringing on the patents of others. The decision also established that patents must be novel in order to be valid. This case set a precedent for future patent infringement cases and established the importance of protecting intellectual property.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In United States v. Corliss Steam-Engine Company, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a patentee had exclusive rights to use their patented invention in any state or territory of the United States. The majority opinion held that Congress did not have the power to grant such an expansive right and thus denied it to patentees. Justice Field dissented from this ruling, arguing that Congress has full authority under Article I of the Constitution to pass laws granting exclusive rights for inventions within all states and territories of the Union. He argued further that since patents are granted by federal law, they should be respected as having equal force throughout all parts of America regardless if they were issued before or after a particular state's admission into union. Thus he concluded that patentees should have exclusive control over their inventions in every part of America so long as those patents remain valid according to federal law.

Opinion written by Justice SJField
Decided: Feb 14, 1876
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms